TASMANIAN ONLINE RED MP PAIRS

Pair 5 - Hugh Grosvenor / Tania Lloyd
Place: 2, Percentage: 59.03%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	2 S	SA	9	140	6	100%
Board 2	6: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	4 N	D4	9	-100	5	83%
Board 3	6: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	2X N	DT	8	180	6	100%
Board 4	6: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	4 S	SQ	10	620	6	100%
Board 5	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3 W	H5	9	-140	5	83%
Board 6	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3 E	D4	7	200	6	100%
Board 7	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3 E	DA	8	100	4	67%
Board 8	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3 E	D5	10	-170	4	67%
Board 9	2: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	4 N	CQ	9	-50	0	0%
Board 10	2: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	4 S	D2	10	620	0	0%
Board 11	2: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	2 S	S7	8	110	2	33%
Board 12	2: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	3 S	HK	8	-100	2	33%
Board 13	7: Gordon Travers / Anne Travers	4 S	DA	11	-650	5	83%
Board 14	7: Gordon Travers / Anne Travers	2NT N	S2	8	-120	3	50%
Board 15	7: Gordon Travers / Anne Travers	4 N	D4	12	-680	2	33%
Board 16	7: Gordon Travers / Anne Travers	4 W	C7	10	620	6	100%
Board 17	4: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	2 E	CJ	10	170	3	50%
Board 18	4: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	3NT E	H6	9	400	4	67%
Board 19	4: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	3NT E	H6	10	630	6	100%
Board 20	4: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	3NT N	HT	11	-660	2	33%
Board 21	3: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	4 N	SQ	8	-200	0	0%
Board 22	3: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	4 W	D4	10	-620	0	0%
Board 23	3: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	2 E	CK	8	-90	6	100%
Board 24	3: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	4 S	SA	9	-50	2	33%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results