TBA ONLINE RED POINT SESSION (1-FEB-23)

Pair 6 - Sue Martin / Sue Falkingham
Place: 10, Percentage: 34.38%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: Simon Benham / Keong Chen	4 S	C9	11	-450	1	12%
Board 2	5: Simon Benham / Keong Chen	3NT S	H5	9	-600	8	100%
Board 3	5: Simon Benham / Keong Chen	3 S	D6	8	50	5	62%
Board 4	9: John Bailey / Hilton Francis	1 W	CK	6	-100	1	12%
Board 5	9: John Bailey / Hilton Francis	3 W	SJ	10	130	2	25%
Board 6	9: John Bailey / Hilton Francis	3NT S	CT	9	-400	3	38%
Board 7	8: Lena Jansson / Merryl Darby	2 S	HJ	8	-90	8	100%
Board 8	8: Lena Jansson / Merryl Darby	3X S	CK	10	-630	0	0%
Board 9	8: Lena Jansson / Merryl Darby	3NT E	S3	9	600	4	50%
Board 10	3: Mardi Grosvenor / John Grosvenor	3NT W	D4	10	-630	2	25%
Board 11	3: Mardi Grosvenor / John Grosvenor	3NT N	C7	9	400	4	50%
Board 12	3: Mardi Grosvenor / John Grosvenor	3NT W	S4	11	-460	2	25%
Board 13	4: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	3 E	SQ	10	-130	6	75%
Board 14	4: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	4X N	HA	9	-100	2	25%
Board 15	4: Betty Pilgrim / Jan Johnston	3 N	HQ	10	130	0	0%
Board 16	7: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	3 S	CA	8	-50	3	38%
Board 17	7: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	2 E	DA	8	-110	1	12%
Board 18	7: Veronika Maddock / Nigel Whitley	1NT N	C3	9	150	2	25%
Board 19	10: Julie Rhodes / Leigh Blizzard	6 W	DK	11	-100	1	12%
Board 20	10: Julie Rhodes / Leigh Blizzard	5 E	S6	11	600	2	25%
Board 21	10: Julie Rhodes / Leigh Blizzard	3 W	CK	8	-50	0	0%
Board 22	2: Tania Lloyd / Hugh Grosvenor	4 E	DA	10	-620	0	0%
Board 23	2: Tania Lloyd / Hugh Grosvenor	4 S	HA	11	650	5	62%
Board 24	2: Tania Lloyd / Hugh Grosvenor	1NT W	S3	7	-90	4	50%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results