TBA ONLINE RED POINT SESSION (1-FEB-23)

Pair 1 - Julia Corr / Shelley James
Place: 8, Percentage: 41.67%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	2: Hugh Grosvenor / Tania Lloyd	3 S	HJ	10	130	3	38%
Board 2	2: Hugh Grosvenor / Tania Lloyd	5 N	C5	12	620	3	38%
Board 3	2: Hugh Grosvenor / Tania Lloyd	2 W	S3	10	-170	0	0%
Board 4	5: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	2 W	CK	7	100	7	88%
Board 5	5: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT E	S6	12	-490	0	0%
Board 6	5: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	1 E	S3	6	100	0	0%
Board 7	9: Hilton Francis / John Bailey	3 N	H4	9	-110	3	38%
Board 8	9: Hilton Francis / John Bailey	4 S	CK	9	50	4	50%
Board 9	9: Hilton Francis / John Bailey	2NT E	S3	8	120	0	0%
Board 10	8: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	3NT E	S7	9	600	2	25%
Board 11	8: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	3NT N	D3	9	-400	4	50%
Board 12	8: Merryl Darby / Lena Jansson	3NT W	C7	9	400	2	25%
Board 13	3: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	4 E	SQ	10	130	2	25%
Board 14	3: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	5X E	ST	6	-1100	0	0%
Board 15	3: John Grosvenor / Mardi Grosvenor	3 N	DA	12	-230	4	50%
Board 16	4: Jan Johnston / Betty Pilgrim	4X W	S8	9	200	6	75%
Board 17	4: Jan Johnston / Betty Pilgrim	2 N	CJ	11	200	8	100%
Board 18	4: Jan Johnston / Betty Pilgrim	4 S	CA	10	620	6	75%
Board 19	7: Nigel Whitley / Veronika Maddock	3NT W	D6	9	-600	1	12%
Board 20	7: Nigel Whitley / Veronika Maddock	3 E	CQ	11	-150	8	100%
Board 21	7: Nigel Whitley / Veronika Maddock	3NT S	HA	6	-300	3	38%
Board 22	10: Leigh Blizzard / Julie Rhodes	4 E	C2	7	300	8	100%
Board 23	10: Leigh Blizzard / Julie Rhodes	4 S	HA	11	650	5	62%
Board 24	10: Leigh Blizzard / Julie Rhodes	2NT S	HQ	5	-150	1	12%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results