TASMANIAN ONLINE RED MP PAIRS (5-OCT-22)

Pair 7 - Julia CORR / Shelley JAMES
Place: 6, Percentage: 44.44%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	8: Jennifer SHARP / Catherine HANCOCK	2 W	D9	6	100	6	100%
Board 2	8: Jennifer SHARP / Catherine HANCOCK	4 S	C7	10	620	3	50%
Board 3	8: Jennifer SHARP / Catherine HANCOCK	2 W	DQ	7	100	4	67%
Board 4	8: Jennifer SHARP / Catherine HANCOCK	4X N	DK	10	790	4	67%
Board 5	6: Merryl DARBY / Lena JANSSON	4 E	D4	12	480	6	100%
Board 6	6: Merryl DARBY / Lena JANSSON	4 S	ST	8	100	6	100%
Board 7	6: Merryl DARBY / Lena JANSSON	1NT S	S6	8	-120	0	0%
Board 8	6: Merryl DARBY / Lena JANSSON	3NT S	SJ	11	-460	0	0%
Board 9	1: Keong CHEN / Anne O'ROURKE	4 W	S2	10	-620	1	17%
Board 10	1: Keong CHEN / Anne O'ROURKE	5 N	HA	10	-100	4	67%
Board 11	1: Keong CHEN / Anne O'ROURKE	4 S	DQ	9	-50	0	0%
Board 12	1: Keong CHEN / Anne O'ROURKE	3 S	HA	8	-100	2	33%
Board 13	5: Jinny FUSS / Sue MARTIN	3 W	HA	9	-140	0	0%
Board 14	5: Jinny FUSS / Sue MARTIN	4 E	C4	10	-420	3	50%
Board 15	5: Jinny FUSS / Sue MARTIN	4 E	HA	8	100	2	33%
Board 16	5: Jinny FUSS / Sue MARTIN	3 N	CT	6	-150	0	0%
Board 17	2: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2NT S	ST	9	150	5	83%
Board 18	2: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	3 W	HT	9	-110	0	0%
Board 19	2: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	4 W	DA	9	100	4	67%
Board 20	2: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	5 W	CJ	12	-620	0	0%
Board 21	4: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	3 N	H4	11	-150	4	67%
Board 22	4: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	4 W	HA	7	-300	2	33%
Board 23	4: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	2 E	CQ	7	-100	4	67%
Board 24	4: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	6 N	CT	11	50	4	67%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results