TASMANIAN ONLINE RED POINT PAIRS (25-MAY-22)

Pair 4 - Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER
Place: 3, Percentage: 56.25%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	3: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	5 N	DJ	9	100	8	100%
Board 2	3: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	4 N	C4	11	-650	0	0%
Board 3	3: Jane ROUTLEY / Pamela LIDL	5X W	CK	11	850	6	75%
Board 4	2: Jan JOHNSTON / Betty PILGRIM	4 N	DQ	11	650	6	75%
Board 5	2: Jan JOHNSTON / Betty PILGRIM	2NT W	DT	7	50	2	25%
Board 6	2: Jan JOHNSTON / Betty PILGRIM	4 S	DQ	12	480	6	75%
Board 7	7: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	2 S	CT	7	-100	2	25%
Board 8	7: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	5 W	HJ	11	-400	6	75%
Board 9	7: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	5 N	HK	10	-50	8	100%
Board 10	10: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	4 E	HK	11	150	4	50%
Board 11	10: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	3 E	C8	9	110	4	50%
Board 12	10: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	1NT S	H5	5	200	8	100%
Board 13	6: Dave MUNRO / Gwyneira BRAHMA	6 W	SQ	11	-100	4	50%
Board 14	6: Dave MUNRO / Gwyneira BRAHMA	3NT N	CT	10	-430	2	25%
Board 15	6: Dave MUNRO / Gwyneira BRAHMA	5 E	CA	11	450	7	88%
Board 16	1: Keong CHEN / Simon BENHAM	3X N	H9	9	-470	0	0%
Board 17	1: Keong CHEN / Simon BENHAM	3NT S	D4	7	100	8	100%
Board 18	1: Keong CHEN / Simon BENHAM	3NT N	H6	12	-690	6	75%
Board 19	5: Marguerite LESTER / Sue RAE	3 S	SA	4	-250	0	0%
Board 20	5: Marguerite LESTER / Sue RAE	3 N	DQ	8	-100	3	38%
Board 21	5: Marguerite LESTER / Sue RAE	5 W	C5	10	50	8	100%
Board 22	9: Gwen WILES / Shelley JAMES	3X E	DA	7	500	7	88%
Board 23	9: Gwen WILES / Shelley JAMES	5 W	H6	13	-640	3	38%
Board 24	9: Gwen WILES / Shelley JAMES	3NT S	S9	7	-100	0	0%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results