TASMANIAN ONLINE RED POINT PAIRS (27-APR-22)

Pair 4 - Brian GILES / Rosemary GILES
Place: 5, Percentage: 48%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 N	DT	8	-110	4	100%
Board 2	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 E	C3	8	110	0	0%
Board 3	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 W	CA	6	-200	3	75%
Board 4	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	3 S	DJ	10	-170	0	0%
Board 5	3: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	5 N	CA	10	100	4	100%
Board 6	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	5 N	CK	9	100	2	50%
Board 7	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	2 N	DA	10	-170	1	25%
Board 8	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3NT W	HT	10	430	4	100%
Board 9	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	4 N	S7	11	-450	4	100%
Board 10	6: Hugh GROSVENOR / John GROSVENOR	3NT E	H4	12	690	4	100%
Board 11	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	5 S	D4	7	-200	0	0%
Board 12	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT E	H4	11	-460	3	75%
Board 13	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT S	D9	9	600	1	25%
Board 14	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	3NT E	C2	10	-430	0	0%
Board 15	1: Keong Chen / Simon Benham	1NT N	DJ	8	120	0	0%
Board 16	5: Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN	1NT S	CK	6	-50	4	100%
Board 17	5: Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN	3 N	HJ	8	-50	2	50%
Board 18	5: Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN	4 E	DA	9	50	4	100%
Board 19	5: Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN	4 S	D5	7	-150	0	0%
Board 20	5: Fiona HICKEY / Alaine MACMORRAN	3NT E	H3	12	-690	0	0%
Board 21	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	2NT N	C9	10	180	4	100%
Board 22	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	6 W	H8	12	-1370	0	0%
Board 23	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	3 W	H4	11	-150	0	0%
Board 24	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	2 W	CA	7	50	2	50%
Board 25	2: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	4 N	C7	10	420	2	50%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results