TASMANIAN ONLINE RED POINT PAIRS (30-MAR-22)

Pair 12 - John GROSVENOR / Hugh GROSVENOR
Place: 9, Percentage: 46.67%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	11: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	3NT W	H3	13	520	9	90%
Board 2	11: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	3X S	HQ	8	200	2	20%
Board 3	11: Nigel WHITLEY / Veronika MADDOCK	3NT W	D5	10	630	8	80%
Board 4	10: John BAILEY / Mardi GROSVENOR	3NT E	HT	10	-630	3	30%
Board 5	10: John BAILEY / Mardi GROSVENOR	3NT S	H5	9	600	4	40%
Board 6	10: John BAILEY / Mardi GROSVENOR	2 S	C6	8	110	5	50%
Board 7	5: Alaine MACMORRAN / Fiona HICKEY	3 S	SQ	9	110	7	70%
Board 8	5: Alaine MACMORRAN / Fiona HICKEY	6 W	C5	13	-1010	4	40%
Board 9	5: Alaine MACMORRAN / Fiona HICKEY	5 E	SQ	10	100	9	90%
Board 10	1: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 N	HK	4	-400	4	40%
Board 11	1: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	3NT N	D7	10	430	10	100%
Board 12	1: Betty PILGRIM / Jan JOHNSTON	2 S	H7	8	110	5	50%
Board 13	6: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	4X W	S7	7	-800	0	0%
Board 14	6: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	5 S	C4	11	-450	5	50%
Board 15	6: Lena JANSSON / Merryl DARBY	1NT W	HK	6	-50	4	40%
Board 16	9: Julia CORR / Shelley JAMES	1NT W	S2	8	-120	4	40%
Board 17	9: Julia CORR / Shelley JAMES	6NT S	CT	11	-50	0	0%
Board 18	9: Julia CORR / Shelley JAMES	3NT S	SK	8	-100	1	10%
Board 19	2: Pamela LIDL / Jane ROUTLEY	3NT N	D9	11	460	8	80%
Board 20	2: Pamela LIDL / Jane ROUTLEY	2 E	S2	9	-140	6	60%
Board 21	2: Pamela LIDL / Jane ROUTLEY	4 N	CQ	10	620	4	40%
Board 22	8: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	3 N	DA	10	-170	0	0%
Board 23	8: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	3 E	CA	8	-100	4	40%
Board 24	8: Simon EDLER / Jane EDLER	4 W	CQ	13	510	6	60%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results