STATE DAYTIME PAIRS SESSION 2 (23-FEB-22)

Pair 10 - Gail Garnham / Kay Potter
Place: 8, Percentage: 50.89%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 5	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	3 E	JH	10	130	3	25%
Board 6	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	4 S	KC	9	50	8	67%
Board 7	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	4 E	7D	9	-100	6	50%
Board 8	2: Leonie Atkins / Mary George	3 W	3S	8	-50	4	33%
Board 9	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3 S	9D	3	300	12	100%
Board 10	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3NT S	2C	9	-600	9	75%
Board 11	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	3 E	8H	7	-100	1	8%
Board 12	7: Margaret Cumming / Irene Chau	2 E	KD	9	140	9	75%
Board 13	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	6NT E	9H	12	1440	9	75%
Board 14	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	3NT S	6H	11	-460	0	0%
Board 15	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	5 E	KS	11	400	7	58%
Board 16	3: Richard Cooke / Bob Patterson	1 E	JD	7	80	10	83%
Board 17	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	2NT S	8S	8	120	7	58%
Board 18	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	2 N	9H	9	140	10	83%
Board 19	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	2 W	TD	6	200	11	92%
Board 20	8: Pam Murphy / Julie Rhodes	3 N	AS	11	150	5	42%
Board 21	4: Julia Corr / Maria Gibbs	3NT N	2C	10	-630	3	25%
Board 22	4: Julia Corr / Maria Gibbs	3 W	AS	9	110	5	42%
Board 23	4: Julia Corr / Maria Gibbs	4 N	5C	10	-620	4	33%
Board 24	4: Julia Corr / Maria Gibbs	1NT W	2D	4	-150	2	17%
Board 25	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	5 N	QH	12	420	6	50%
Board 26	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	5 S	6H	11	600	1	8%
Board 27	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	6 S	5C	11	-50	0	0%
Board 28	1: Adrienne Norton / Susan West	4 E	AS	11	-450	6	50%
Board 29	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	1NTX E	8H	6	-200	1	8%
Board 30	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	3 S	6D	12	-230	12	100%
Board 31	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	4 E	QS	13	510	9	75%
Board 32	5: Hugh Grosvenor / Ian Bailey	2 W	5D	7	-100	11	92%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results